One of the defining issues of the strife that befell the immediate
post-communist world of the former Yugoslav states was the question of
what states would retain aspects of the Yugoslav military.
The
ability to protect a nation-state is directly predicated in most
instances on the strength of that nation’s armed forces and while no
state wishes to have to apply military might, most ensure some degree of
independence in regard to their armed forces, with such being true even
of nations such as Sweden and Denmark that have not needed to resort to
protective warfare since the Second World War. For Serbia, this
question in the 1990s was acute and it continues to be a key issue
today.
The Kosovo War proved, once NATO became involved, that for
the type of geopolitical situation that the Balkans present, air power
was the most efficient form of military power and also the one that
presented the least risk and loss of life to those who prosecute a war
with air power. RAND Corporation analyst Ben Lambeth has written about
this topic and presented in his book-length study NATO’s Air War for
Kosovo (
RAND, 1999)
a very compelling argument that air power was the most-rational
approach for NATO and also the approach that could be expected for any
nation with the means to apply an air force in future conflicts in the
Balkans.
Moreover, the immediate needs in terms of national
security are ones of what we can term “national surety”, or the idea
that the nation-state’s status as such will not be disputed by other
nations simply because that state is seen as weak or unable to
articulate a comprehensive, robust, defense against foreign incursion.
To provide this security for a state like Serbia, air power is the
logical answer: a means to either safeguard homeland interests or to, if
needed, take the fight directly to the enemy.
During the Cold
War, Yugoslavia mirrored the weapons systems and training pedagogy of
the Soviet Union and even today, those products and practices make up
the lion’s share of the Serbian armed forces’ approach to warfare.
Therefore, it should not be surprising that according to the aviation
news website
The Aviationist,
Serbia is set to purchase MiG-29 fighter aircraft in the newest variant
of this airplane, the M2. Journalist Jacek Siminski at The Aviationist
notes—as have other analysts and writers—that the MiG-35 may in fact be
offered to Serbia though while there has been much speculation in
military aviation circles regarding this, no concrete evidence has
turned up to suggest such a sale of the even more-advanced MiG-35, which
itself is a more-evolved version developed out of the MiG-29M2
technology.
PAK-FA
All
of this is quite interesting for those involved in national defense
studies and casual fans of military aircraft alike because Russia is
also developing the PAK-FA, a fifth-generation advanced fighter aircraft
on par with the United States’ F-35 and Europe’s Eurofighter Typhoon.
If anything, what is known of the PAK-FA’s design suggests it to be more
advanced than the F-35 and equal or better in many regards to the
Typhoon as well.
Thus far, the only planned partnership sales of
the PAK-FA will be to India in the variant of the Sukhoi/HAL FGFA
fighter, though by year 2025, exports of either this Indian variant or
the original Russian PAK-FA to nations such as Vietnam and South Korea
(which is also entertaining other fifth-generation fighters to meet its
needs) may well take place. The older Sukhoi Su-30 aircraft would also
be a good contender for Serbia given its high degree of precise
handling, two-seat configuration (which the MiG-29 also offers in the M2
variant and is desired by Serbia, apparently), and its fuel range,
which is less than ideal for Russia’s vast geography but would easily
suffice for Serbia’s needs.
Indeed, it is the Su-30 that on paper
appears to be the best choice for Serbia at the best cost, yet the
MiG-29 appears to be favored by the Serbian military for reasons that
are not fully clear. One possible reason is that Serbia is already using
older MiG-29s and thus the pilots and ground crews know their way
around the MiG better than other aircraft and it is also very possible
that the MiG-29M2 will be offered at a cost as low or lower than the
Su-30 could be provisioned. One key obstacle—aside from its highly
classified systems that Russia may not wish to provide to other
nations—to export sales of the PAK-FA has been its astronomical cost.
Interestingly,
at one point Yugoslavia sought to design and produce its own tactical
fighter, the Novi Avion, but with the break-up of the Yugoslav state
this project was abandoned. The Vazduhoplovno Tehnicki Institut had
designed most of the airframe, powerplant, and control system aspects of
the Novi Avion and the entire aircraft was around only a year away from
entering its first stages of actual production. While a French-built
jet engine and some French expertise in radar design were incorporated
into the Novi Avion, the design was fully the work of engineers in
Belgrade and not patterned after any extant foreign fighter aircraft.
The operational parameters of the Novi Avion interestingly would put it
more or less in the same tactical class of fighters as the Su-30, albeit
the Novi Avion was a single-pilot and single-engine aircraft whereas
the Su-30 is a two-crew, dual-engine fighter.
Serbia’s military
may now rue the day the Novi Avion was left on the drafting table, given
that while there are more choices than ever for fourth and
fifth-generation fighter aircraft, most from Russia will come with high
costs and perhaps without all the advantages the Serbian military may
desire. Russia, though long a prime exporter to China and other nations
it believed to be friendly, seems now more interested in building vastly
different export models of aircraft than those kept at home for its own
military.
The PAK-FA, which is possibly the most-exciting fighter
aircraft currently entering production, would seem to be the fighter
everyone would want, but whether Russia will desire to sell it is
another story and yet unknown. The most-advanced of the MiG-29s would be
logical for Serbia though and the aircraft promises to be
well-supported for at least another couple decades into the future.
0 comments:
Post a Comment